About
Attends the signing meeting from an office outside the tasking chain, at somebody's request, and states her hard stop at the start of the meeting rather than sprung at the end. Takes the matter of June — who stayed on Hart, whose consent was witnessed by three people before she signed, and whose own statement says that taking her off that ground ends her. Her value is that she will not pretend. She cannot say whether consent holds at that range; she says nobody can, and that anybody claiming otherwise has not looked.
Attends the signing meeting from an office outside the tasking chain, at somebody's request, and states her hard stop at the start of the meeting rather than sprung at the end. Takes the matter of June — who stayed on Hart, whose consent was witnessed by three people before she signed, and whose own statement says that taking her off that ground ends her. Her value is that she will not pretend. She cannot say whether consent holds at that range; she says nobody can, and that anybody claiming otherwise has not looked. What she offers instead is procedural permanence: lodging the matter and getting it listed, after which no office can close it — a person has to close it in front of another person, with reasons, and the reasons go on the record. She writes her own name, her office and a reference on the corner of the page, so the thread is traceable to her and not to a building.