Junction
Junction 14-A
ISNA classification (canonical exact text): > "unidentified deep-field phenomenon — junction 14-A vicinity — no classification available at this time" Verified across: series-8-drift/book-2/chapter-map.md:55, 198; series-8-drift/book-2/specs/-spec.md (End State / Beat 2); bible/09-date-register.md:319; CLAUDE.md S8B2 key canon. Shorthand reference: Proxima Anomaly, Junction 14-A. Filing. ISNA…
Type
junction
Within
deep-field
Seam state
ACTIVE
Connects to
proxima-centauri-vicinity
Position
Canon has not established a position
Classification
ISNA classification (canonical exact text): > "unidentified deep-field phenomenon — junction 14-A vicinity — no classification available at this time" Verified across: series-8-drift/book-2/chapter-map.md:55, 198; series-8-drift/book-2/specs/-spec.md (End State / Beat 2); bible/09-date-register.md:319; CLAUDE.md S8B2 key canon. Shorthand reference: Proxima Anomaly, Junction 14-A. Filing. ISNA classifies within 24 hours of return. ISNA Form 2134-CIO-7 Crew Loss in Junction Vicinity filed by…
Wound state
S8B2 Wound-shadow signature (per series overview): drift instruments return a persistent 0.03% entropy offset on every calibration run. Luo Jia adjusts the baseline and attributes it to instrument drift. She is right that adjusting produces accurate readings. Per-chapter Wound-shadow track during 2142 mission (per chapter-map Wound-Shadow Plan): Drift-profile mechanism. Per Luo Jia's post-2135 boundary-condition framework, the 0.03% offset had been at design-specification operational boundary…
Canon has not fixed this place in space, so the archive does not invent a coordinate for it. It appears in the gazetteer as unplaced rather than on the star map as a guess.
On the record
- Junction known to ISNA as deep-field entry point in the Earth-vicinity network. No documented traversal attempts before the 2142 NV Erika Magnusdóttir survey mission.
- ~July 2142: Erika departs Svalbard
- Day 1 in-system (~early September 2142): arrival 0.3 AU outside expected entry
- Days 1–3: third calibration sweep returns signal at array base frequency, structurally similar to Erika's broadcast, phase-shifted
- Days 4–8: Petra Sigurðsson recognises the Anomaly's structural pattern from 2132 GIR-2132 records
- Days 9–12: Reidar Halvorsen develops a response-mapping framework; phase-shifts correlate with Erika's broadcast frequencies at predictable ~12-second intervals
- Day 15: routine observation; offset spikes briefly to 0.04% at hour 6, Luo Jia adjusts back to 0.03%
- Day 18 evening: Halland's decision-deferral; observation continues through Day 24